This has absolutely nothing to do with either games or my site’s new theme. I’ll get around to both of those eventually.
I read an interesting article on Weblog Tools Collection today, and I thought I’d throw you my thoughts on the subject.
As all of you probably know, I seem to have some kind of issue paying for stuff online. Not that I can’t pay, but that I don’t want to pay. We were talking about this in a Flash Game Monetization thread on the forums, and you remember how I strongly opposed any kind of payment for a flash game. I don’t know why my mind is set like this, it just is. And as you can guess I’m also against paid Wordpress plugins.
I’m going to take you into some crazy metaphor now, that’s probably going to end up sounding crazy when I’m done writing, but that still illustrates my point somehow. Let’s say I want to buy a chair for my apartment/house. The vast majority of the public would go to either a furniture or a chair maker and buy one. But instead, let’s image that I know how to make chairs. If I own a large area of land with a bunch of trees on it, I could get the wood and make my own chair if I wanted to. Obviously these are skills that not everyone has, but since I know how to do this I want to use it to my advantage. So instead of going out to a furniture store, I’ll make the chair myself. Sure it might take a little longer and it might not look as nice as someone else’s could, but I have the chair I wanted and I didn’t have to spend any money.
Now let’s go back to the real world. Let’s say I own a WP site (how many do I run now?), and I want to extend its functionality in some way. I’m just like the chair maker above. I know how to make a plugin, so why should I spend my money on having someone else make it for me? Now there’s no point for every single programmer on the internet to do this, so instead I’ll post the code online for someone else to use. And if some other designer makes the same thing that I want, who am I to say no?
Now I’m not saying I can make anything. Akismet is probably the best example of this. It’s gotta be the most useful and most complex plugin out there, and I respect it for that. There’s no way I could replicate that on my own, and I accept that. But if tomorrow they decided to start charging for it, I would not pay. Yes it means I would have to moderate every individual comment I get, but this wouldn’t be an issue considering a day when I get more than 2 comments is peak traffic. Larger sites, with better business models, could afford this though.
And I guess this brings up another point. By definition, plugins extend Wordpress, they don’t provide its basic functionality. So if a plugin decides to start charging, I can just give it the boot. I’m running 19 plugins right now, but I honestly don’t consider any of them essential enough to pay for. And any of them that I really want, I could just make myself. Heck, I could make WP Ajax Edit Comments if I really wanted to. Not saying that I plan to, but I could if I wanted. (Fun fact, that plugin is charging people to use any newer version, although they left their last version online for anyone who wanted it. That’s what I use, and I hope it never breaks.)
And even if plugins do start charging for their use, there would be ways around this. As I’ve probably said before, the internet simply cannot be used for making money except in some special circumstances. People (like me) are always looking for ways to not spend money, and in most cases pirating a plugin would be easier than the alternative. Personally, this is where I draw the line, as I would rather go without something than have a pirated version of it, but not everyone is like this. I mean, if you look at programs like Photoshop, Flash, or any expensive software, you can find places to download the gigantic EXE online, so obviously a 5 KB .zip file wouldn’t deter people. Obviously this isn’t my ideal view of the internet, but these are the facts.
While I’m not saying that as a web designer I should be privileged into getting free plugins, or that furniture stores should start handing out free stuff to carpenters, hopefully you’ll understand my mentality toward the subject a bit more.

| Quote
Post Count: 40
I understand you completely. I’d never pay for a plugin on the internet. Then I’d be retarded. First: plugins are just something you can use on a blog. A BLOG! Not you OS. It’s just there to look nice and help you and probably your readers.
Akismet is one of the best plugins. And they don’t charge you. They could charge for premium service though. Customizing it, if you’d like to call it that. Akismet is popular because it’s powerful AND free!
Can you guess how popular it would become to make a Flash game. If Adobe flash released their older versions for free? I think that there would be a whole lot more good flash games if they did so.
But there’s a catch. Now Adobe would have to put time into their new versions. They’d have to make it look good and add lots of useful and cool features in the latest version. The version you’ll have to pay for. And well, then they’d have to release all those cool features to anyone when they make a new one.
tl:dr; If Adobe was to release the old versions of their programs, they’d have to work with the new versions. Which would be way to hard for those guys.
Yeah.. I probably sound like a crazy guy. But I think my point and my place in this discussion is clear enough…
| Quote
Post Count: 27
Even if there were a plugin for my OS, chances are I could get by without it. I mean, unless Windows had a serious problem (imagine that!), there’s nothing that you would need essentially. I wouldn’t pay for something like that.
And then Adobe’s whole monopoly on the market is a whole other rant I could do here. Even if Adobe didn’t release their older versions for free, but a price that lesser nobility can afford, there would be a lot more Flash games out there. Or even if it’s not an old version, but a watered down version that is cheaper and has the tools I don’t need. Like all the fancy brushes and art tools. I understand why artists would want those, but since I mainly just use Flash as a compiler (AP does all the art in his own copy of Photoshop), those are features I’m paying for that are useless. So make them pay more if they want Flash at full power, but people like me should be able to get a less expensive version. Adobe’s pretty good about Photoshop in this regard, making a watered down version without all the crazy tools (that’s what I have, and it’s still pretty powerful), so I don’t see why they wouldn’t do it with Flash.